One interesting piece in NYT that talks about how "Omnivorousness is part of a much broader trend in the behavior of our elite, one that embraces diversity..."
Here are a couple of quotes:
To talk of “elite culture,” it seems, is to talk of something quaint,
something anti-American and anti-democratic. Whereas the old elites used
their culture to make explicit the differences between themselves and
the rest, if you were to talk to members of the elite today, many would
tell you that their culture is simply an expression of their
open-minded, creative, ready-to-pounce-on-any-opportunity ethic. Others
would object to the idea that they were part of an elite in the first
place.
Unlike the shared class character of Gilded Age elites, omnivores seem
highly distinct and their tastes appear to be a matter of personal
expression. Instead of liking things like opera because that’s what
people of your class are supposed to like, the omnivore likes what he
likes because it is an expression of a distinct self. Perhaps liking a
range of things explains why elites are elite, and not the other way
around.
No comments:
Post a Comment